Sunday, August 28, 2016

Understanding SOPA and pipes


Understanding SOPA and pipes. Hi my travel malang juanda brothers all! Udah lama gak posting nih. Hehehe ... This time I want to discuss about the sense of SOPA and pipes. Probably from my brothers all udah lot heard shouts in various social networking about SOPA and pipes. Well, actually the fuck heck Pengetian SOPA and pipe it? Yeaah, probably also my brothers all've no one knows, and probably also my brothers still not many know about the sense of SOPA and pipes. Okay, without further ADO, please read the article about Understanding SOPA and pipe version KASKUS:)


Okay, this time to the article I will be taking the writing of the next door neighbor, namely KASKUS (http://www.kaskus.us). Because its contents are already covers what should be known by all of us.



SOPA and pipes




What is the basis of the main commands act on this PIPE and SOPA?

SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act) and the pipe (IP Protec Act) was legislation proposed last year by US senator and high officials for the purpose of protecting the copyright of internet material such as video, music, software and digital goods, all from piracy. SOPA and pipes set up how cyberspace should have according to them, and of course its users. However, this law is not as simple as that, a lot of things from this law would change the workings of the internet today.

What is the basis of the main commands act on this PIPE and SOPA?


The US Government and corporate organizations copyright owners can ask internet service providers (ISPs) to block access to web sites that are considered as the place of copyright infringement. Technically, that ordered ISPS to block their DNS domain name from reading a site in the country outside of the US who keep illegal content such as videos, songs, or photo/image.
The US Government and corporate organizations copyright owner can take legal action to sue the search engine, blog site, directory, or site in General who have blacklisted sites to be removed from their website. Technically, that ordered the search sites like Google or other to change its search query by excluding sites that keep illegal content. Practice similar to that in China. When there are netter typing ' Tibet ' or ' Tianamen bamboo curtain country ' it's certainly not found search results on Google.
The U.S. Attorney General can bring a case to a court that would force search engines, advertisers, DNS, server, provider and payment processor from having any contact with the alleged infringing site. Technically, that ordered the ad service like Google Adsense ads or to refuse payments from outside the U.S. site that keep illegal content. Payment processors can be severed a partnership with the site, when they give a compelling reason that the site violated copyright. Technically, that is ordered online payment services such as Amazon, etc. to turn off account from the site outside of the US who keep illegal content.
The Bill also could potentially give the threat more than that because the site definition hijackers carried SOPA was considered too broad. SOPA do not only threaten the underground sites that provide free movie or song, but also sites that are considered and suspected ' simplify or facilitate ' pirated material can join Barcelona.





Example Cases


When a spectator of concerts recorded at the appearance through a mobile phone and then uploaded to YouTube without permission of the copyright holder or distributor, according to Bill considered YouTube of facilitating copyright infringement. Consequently YouTube must be blocked and closed, and the uploader was penalized. Consequently not impossible one site containing tens of thousands of pages can be turned off just because of a single page containing copyright infringement.

What is the impact if the legislation is passed?


With the legalization of SOPA and pipes, of course will make the Giants a classmate of Google, Yahoo, Facebook and Mozilla a shout. While its impact globally is cyberspace visitors will no longer be able to perform the download and such because the law considers illegal.

Of course, many aspects of the Internet that will change, one of the implementation will be done by SOPA and pipes against Internet Filtering and DNS DNSSEC is believed by experts of the internet and one of them, Mozilla, that doing so will lead to security issues on the Internet and also delay the performance of the internet today. There are also other impacts that will occur on the internet, among other things:

A lot of blogs or sites that will be closed due to the use of e.g. a logo, photos or other media that is claimed by the owner.
Service web sites and social media like YouTube, Facebook, Multiply, rapid * share, Twitter, Flickr, etc. will be having a lot of problems and sued for the content-the content is dikontribusi by the public will be filtered and monitored strictly.
Innovation and technological development of the Internet will slow down because the new companies should be able to meet the standards of the SOPA and pipes.



Whether this will have an impact throughout the world, including Indonesia?



Of course, with such legislation, then the U.S. Government reserves the right to sue the site to remove content which, according to their illegal or the site will be blocked (via local ISP), so that users can no longer open a favourite site. Broadly speaking, the SOPA and pipes if approved will only apply in the U.S. and not in other countries. BUT, if anyone uses servers in the United States for hosting the website, surely the website content will enter into legal jurisdiction there. Indeed directly, SOPA and pipes do not affect internet network in Indonesia. However, it is imaginable to us the everyday uses service-service social media such as Multiply, Facebook, Google, Twitter, YouTube, and others; most website-this website will become a target goal of SOPA and pipes. The use of the internet will certainly change if SOPA and pipe passed.

To put it simply, because it is in fact on the internet many sites (outside the U.S.) that stores content, U.S. looking for ways so that Parliament could prohibit the presence of such sites and curb the so-called freedom of the internet, because actually the SOPA and pipes could impact more broadly than just banning content. Technically, if the site is outside the United States, then the internet service provider (ISP) are required to block access to that site.


What are the obstacles faced by the opponents of the BILL and the pipeline is SOPA?


In December 2011, a coalition of anti-SOPA advertise a full page in almost all national media. Unmitigated, Google even hired a lobbyist firm 15 to head off a package Bill in order not to ratified. However, the enemies faced anti-SOPA was not lightly, their opponent caliber. Understand the music industry, movies and the American Chamber of commerce were behind the BILL. One American Film Distributors Association (MPPAA) organization that manages name nganjuk like Universal Pictures, Sony, Warner Bros. and 20th Century Fox. It was known during the MPPA been targeting sites cannot be accessed outside us residents and is seen as the party always lose when facing foreign hijackers.


Almost all mass media sniping and criticizing the Bill in its editorial, as TechDirt. Do not miss the sites technology also voiced opposition. The movement, the anti-SOPA was indeed strong, but those outside Congress. While in Congress to support the package consisting of two Bill is also very serious. The battle of the two camps of pro and anti BILL could be the stronghold won pro (because it supported a giant financier).

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.